Strategic levels provide a structured framework for understanding how strategy is formulated and implemented within organisations. This article examines the three primary levels of strategy: corporate strategy, business strategy, and functional strategy, and analyses their roles in achieving organisational coherence and competitive advantage.

Corporate strategy defines the overall direction and scope of the organisation, determining in which markets and industries it will operate and how resources are allocated across business units. It addresses long-term growth, diversification, governance, and stakeholder relationships. Business-level strategy focuses on competitive positioning within specific markets, examining how organisations create value for customers and outperform rivals through cost leadership, differentiation, or focused strategies. Functional strategy translates higher-level strategic intent into operational policies across departments such as marketing, operations, finance, and human resources.

The article highlights the interdependence of these strategic levels and the importance of alignment between them. Strategic coherence ensures that corporate ambitions are supported by competitive positioning and operational capabilities. Tools such as the Balanced Scorecard and value chain analysis facilitate this alignment by linking objectives to performance outcomes.

The relevance of strategic levels is particularly significant for startups and small and medium-sized enterprises, where roles often overlap but clarity of strategic intent remains essential. While the framework has limitations, including potential oversimplification and challenges in dynamic environments, it remains a valuable analytical structure for integrating strategy formulation and execution.

Overall, strategic levels offer a comprehensive lens for understanding organisational strategy. They provide the foundation for applying analytical tools and for guiding decision-making across all areas of the organisation. When effectively integrated, corporate, business, and functional strategies contribute to sustainable competitive advantage and long-term organisational success.


1. Introduction

Strategic management operates across multiple levels within an organisation, each addressing distinct but interrelated dimensions of decision-making. These levels define how strategy is formulated, communicated, and implemented throughout the organisational hierarchy. Understanding strategic levels is essential for ensuring coherence between long-term vision and day-to-day operations. Without alignment across levels, organisations risk fragmentation, inefficiency, and loss of competitive advantage (Johnson et al., 2017).

The concept of strategic levels is rooted in early strategic management literature, particularly in the work of Chandler (1962), who emphasised the relationship between strategy and structure. Over time, scholars have identified three primary levels of strategy: corporate strategy, business strategy, and functional strategy. Each level focuses on different questions: corporate strategy addresses where the organisation competes, business strategy concerns how it competes, and functional strategy determines how resources and processes support competitive positioning (Porter, 1985).

This article examines the theoretical foundations, roles, and interactions of these three strategic levels. It explores their contribution to organisational performance, their relevance in contemporary business environments, and their application in startups and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Furthermore, the article critically evaluates limitations and challenges associated with managing strategy across multiple levels. By clarifying strategic levels, this article provides a structural framework for integrating subsequent strategy tools such as SWOT, PESTEL, Porter’s Five Forces, and the Ansoff Matrix.

2. Conceptual Foundations of Strategic Levels

The distinction between strategic levels reflects the complexity of modern organisations and the need to coordinate decisions across different scopes of responsibility. Corporate-level decisions involve portfolio management and organisational purpose, business-level decisions address market competition, and functional-level decisions concern operational execution (Johnson et al., 2017).

Mintzberg et al. (2009) argue that strategy is both deliberate and emergent, shaped by top management intent and by patterns of behaviour across the organisation. Strategic levels provide a structured means of understanding how these patterns develop and interact. They also facilitate accountability by clarifying who is responsible for which strategic decisions.

The three-level framework is not rigid but analytical. In practice, especially within smaller firms, these levels may overlap. However, the conceptual separation remains useful for organising strategic thinking and ensuring alignment between vision, competitive positioning, and operational capabilities.

3. Corporate-Level Strategy

3.1 Definition and Scope

Corporate-level strategy concerns the overall direction and scope of the organisation. It addresses fundamental questions about organisational purpose, portfolio composition, and resource allocation across business units (Chandler, 1962; Johnson et al., 2017). Corporate strategy determines in which industries or markets the organisation will operate and how value will be created at the organisational level.

Key decisions at this level include diversification, mergers and acquisitions, vertical integration, and international expansion. Corporate strategy also encompasses governance structures and stakeholder relationships, linking strategic management with corporate governance and ethical responsibility (Tricker, 2019).

3.2 Corporate Strategy and Value Creation

Corporate strategy seeks to create value through synergy among business units. Synergy may arise from shared resources, knowledge transfer, or coordinated branding (Porter, 1987). The resource-based view suggests that corporate advantage depends on the effective allocation and development of strategic resources (Barney, 1991).

Portfolio management tools such as the BCG Matrix and GE-McKinsey matrix assist corporate decision-makers in evaluating business unit performance and investment priorities (Henderson, 1970). These tools provide structured approaches to balancing risk and growth across organisational activities.

3.3 Corporate Strategy and Stakeholders

Stakeholder theory emphasises that corporate strategy must consider the interests of multiple stakeholder groups rather than shareholders alone (Freeman, 1984). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability strategies increasingly influence corporate-level decisions, reflecting societal expectations and regulatory pressures (Porter and Kramer, 2011).

4. Business-Level Strategy

4.1 Definition and Focus

Business-level strategy concerns how an organisation competes within a particular market or industry. It focuses on positioning, differentiation, and competitive advantage (Porter, 1985). While corporate strategy determines where to compete, business strategy determines how to compete.

Business strategy addresses questions such as:

  • How can the organisation attract and retain customers?

  • How can it outperform competitors?

  • What value proposition does it offer?

4.2 Competitive Positioning

Porter’s Generic Strategies framework identifies three primary competitive approaches: cost leadership, differentiation, and focus (Porter, 1985). These strategies require consistency across activities and alignment with organisational capabilities.

Market segmentation and targeting further refine business strategy by identifying specific customer groups and tailoring offerings accordingly (Kotler and Keller, 2016). Industry analysis tools such as Porter’s Five Forces support evaluation of competitive pressures and profitability potential.

4.3 Business Strategy and Innovation

Innovation plays a critical role at the business level. Dynamic capabilities theory emphasises the organisation’s ability to adapt and reconfigure resources in response to environmental change (Teece et al., 1997). Business strategies increasingly integrate digital transformation and innovation to sustain competitiveness.

5. Functional-Level Strategy

5.1 Definition and Role

Functional-level strategy concerns how individual departments and functions support business and corporate strategies. These functions include marketing, operations, finance, human resources, and information systems. Functional strategies translate higher-level strategic intent into operational policies and practices (Johnson et al., 2017).

For example:

  • Marketing strategy supports differentiation through branding and customer engagement.

  • Operations strategy supports cost leadership through efficiency and quality management.

  • HR strategy supports organisational culture and capability development.

5.2 Value Chain Perspective

Porter’s (1985) value chain framework illustrates how functional activities contribute to value creation. Primary activities (such as production and marketing) and support activities (such as procurement and HR) must align with strategic objectives to achieve competitive advantage.

Functional strategies are critical for implementation. Even well-designed corporate and business strategies will fail without effective functional execution (Mintzberg, 1994).

6. Alignment and Integration of Strategic Levels

Strategic alignment refers to coherence between corporate, business, and functional strategies. Misalignment can result in conflicting priorities, resource waste, and strategic drift (Johnson et al., 2017).

Balanced Scorecard systems facilitate alignment by linking strategic objectives to performance indicators across organisational levels (Kaplan and Norton, 1996). Communication and leadership play central roles in ensuring that strategic intent is understood throughout the organisation.

Mintzberg (1994) cautions against over-formalisation, arguing that strategy emerges through learning and adaptation. Nevertheless, strategic levels provide a necessary structure for integrating emergent insights into deliberate planning.

7. Strategic Levels in Startups and SMEs

In startups and SMEs, strategic levels often overlap due to limited organisational structure. Entrepreneurs typically perform corporate, business, and functional roles simultaneously. However, conceptualising strategic levels remains valuable for clarity and growth planning (Blank and Dorf, 2012).

Corporate strategy in startups focuses on defining purpose and growth direction. Business strategy centres on market entry and competitive positioning. Functional strategy addresses operational survival and efficiency. As startups scale, formal separation of strategic levels becomes increasingly important.

Lean Startup theory emphasises iterative strategy development based on customer feedback rather than rigid planning (Ries, 2011). This approach aligns with dynamic capability theory and highlights the need for flexibility across strategic levels.

8. Criticisms and Limitations

The strategic levels framework has been criticised for oversimplification. Real-world organisations often face blurred boundaries between levels, particularly in networked or platform-based firms (Mintzberg et al., 2009). Additionally, the model assumes hierarchical decision-making, which may not reflect contemporary agile organisations.

Another limitation concerns environmental turbulence. Rapid technological change challenges long-term corporate strategies and requires continuous adjustment (Teece et al., 1997). Strategic levels must therefore be adaptive rather than static.

Institutional pressures may also distort strategic coherence, as organisations adopt formal structures for legitimacy rather than effectiveness (DiMaggio and Powell, 1983).

9. Strategic Implications

Understanding strategic levels enables organisations to integrate analytical tools effectively. External analysis informs corporate and business strategy, while internal analysis supports functional and business strategy development. Strategic choices and methods depend on alignment across levels.

Leadership must ensure that vision and mission guide decisions at all levels and that objectives provide measurable benchmarks for success. Strategic levels thus serve as a bridge between conceptual intent and operational reality.

10. Conclusion

Strategic levels represent a foundational framework for understanding how strategy operates within organisations. Corporate strategy defines overall direction and scope, business strategy determines competitive positioning, and functional strategy ensures effective implementation. Together, these levels provide coherence, accountability, and adaptability.

This article has demonstrated that strategic levels are essential for integrating strategic analysis, decision-making, and execution. While limitations exist, the framework remains academically robust and practically relevant for both large organisations and startups. As part of the broader Strategy Tools series, this article establishes a structural lens through which subsequent frameworks can be understood and applied.

References (OBU Harvard Style)

Barney, J. (1991) ‘Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage’, Journal of Management, 17(1), pp. 99–120.

Blank, S. and Dorf, B. (2012) The Startup Owner’s Manual. Pescadero, CA: K&S Ranch.

Chandler, A.D. (1962) Strategy and Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. (1983) ‘The iron cage revisited’, American Sociological Review, 48(2), pp. 147–160.

Freeman, R.E. (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.

Henderson, B.D. (1970) The Product Portfolio. Boston: Boston Consulting Group.

Johnson, G., Scholes, K. and Whittington, R. (2017) Exploring Strategy. 11th edn. Harlow: Pearson Education.

Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1996) The Balanced Scorecard. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Kotler, P. and Keller, K.L. (2016) Marketing Management. 15th edn. Harlow: Pearson Education.

Mintzberg, H. (1994) The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning. New York: Free Press.

Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B. and Lampel, J. (2009) Strategy Safari. 2nd edn. Harlow: Pearson.

Porter, M.E. (1985) Competitive Advantage. New York: Free Press.

Porter, M.E. (1987) ‘From competitive advantage to corporate strategy’, Harvard Business Review, 65(3), pp. 43–59.

Porter, M.E. and Kramer, M.R. (2011) ‘Creating shared value’, Harvard Business Review, 89(1–2), pp. 62–77.

Ries, E. (2011) The Lean Startup. New York: Crown Publishing.

Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997) ‘Dynamic capabilities and strategic management’, Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), pp. 509–533.

Tricker, B. (2019) Corporate Governance. 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.